Showing posts with label hell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hell. Show all posts

Thursday, October 2, 2025

The origin of the lie about hellfire

 

The concept of torturing people in hellfire for eternity is not taught in the Bible. Archaeologists digging up temples of pagan gods, from Egyptians to Buddhists to Mayans, have found abundant evidence that, completely unrelated to the Bible, pagan priests regularly threatened their laity with an afterlife of fire – no doubt for breaking the priests’ rules, or failure to pay for the priests’ lifestyles.

"Hellfire" should not appear anywhere in a good translation of the Bible. 

If God intended fiery torture to be a potential penalty for Adam and Eve for disobedience, justice would demand that God should have warned them of it. But He didn’t.

The only warning God gave Adam and Eve about disobeying Him was: “As for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad, you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will certainly die.” (Genesis 2:16, 17)

After Adam disobeyed, did God then bring up hellfire? No. “In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For dust you are and to dust you will return.” (Genesis 3:19)

That’s it. Death, even in open defiance of God, equals returning to the dust. No mention of burning forever.

So, how did the idea of burning as punishment get so popular?

Jesus called Satan the “father of the lie.” (John 8:44) It is no stretch to imagine him coming up with the hellfire lie to get people to obey his priests.

The hellfire-and-brimstone crowd should take a warning from that. They should be trying to avoid doing Satan’s work. Instead, they have found verses in the Bible they can twist to sell the threat to their parishioners.

Let’s see if we can make those passages less ambiguous. 

'Fire' is introduced very early in human history, but not as a torture. (Genesis 3:19, 24) If you set aside the ‘fire’ references to cooking, heat, light, and sacrifices, the one use of fire that remains notable is destruction – whether disposing of waste or destroying conquered cities.

Many of the passages that refer to destruction by fire modify the word ‘fire’ with the word ‘consuming’. The fire didn’t just destroy something, it “consumed” it. It left no trace. This was true of Sodom and Gomorrah, the fire that destroyed Aaron’s misbehaving sons, Nadab and Abihu, and the fire that “consumed” the Israelites who were bitterly complaining in the Wilderness. (Numbers 11:1)

Israelite law required them to reduce to ashes the idols of the pagans; and, in some cases of heinous crimes, to burn the corpses of those who had been executed.

Interestingly, before they even got to the Promised Land Jehovah warned the Israelites about a practice they would encounter (Deuteronomy 12:31): “They do for their gods every detestable thing that Jehovah hates, even burning their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.” The message was repeated 700 years later in the time of King Ahaz (2 Kings 16:1-3) and a century and a half after that in the time of King Zedekiah (Jeremiah 32:35), each time emphasizing that God found the practice “detestable”.

Fire did not signify torture. It signified complete destruction.

Let’s tackle some other passages that have been misused:

Isaiah 66:24 foretells the future of some wicked Israelites: “And they will go out and look on the carcasses of the men who rebelled against me; For the worms on them will not die, And their fire will not be extinguished.”

Undying worms and fire sounds a lot like hell, doesn’t it? But wait:

That verse does not say that the men would be somehow ‘undead’, to be tortured forever. In fact, it refers to them as carcasses. And all the scriptures from Adam to Revelation make it clear that the dead are dead. Rather, it says the fire would not die; the worms would not die.

Worms don’t live forever, but they do live a surprisingly long time – 5 to 9 years under ideal conditions. They also consume their body weight every day. I don’t know how much a worm weighs, but I’m pretty sure 9 years would be more than enough time for the worms to completely consume the carcass of a wicked person.

Fire, likewise, doesn’t last forever. But it does last as long as there is fuel. So worms and fire would definitely outlast a corpse. Worms are not compatible with fire, obviously.  But if a corpse is tossed into a fire, and some of it isn’t actually in the flames, the worms would surely take care of it.

Here are some others the hellfire folks love: “Then he will say to those on his left: ‘Go away from me, you who have been cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels.” (Matthew 25:41) Is that hellfire? No. The fire is everlasting. Those condemned to it are dead, and “the dead know nothing” (Ecclesiastes 9:5). "Prepared for the Devil" doesn't mean he lives there; it means his destruction. (Rev. 20:10)

“He will clean up his threshing floor completely and will gather his wheat into the storehouse, but the chaff he will burn up with fire that cannot be put out.” (Matthew 3:12) Clearly, this is an illustration. People aren’t chaff; fire doesn’t last forever. But if you were chaff, fire sure would wipe you away.

 “If, then, your hand or your foot makes you stumble, cut it off and throw it away from you. It is better for you to enter into life maimed or lame than to be thrown with two hands or two feet into the everlasting fire. Also, if your eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it away from you. It is better for you to enter one-eyed into life than to be thrown with two eyes into the fiery Gehenna.” (Matthew 18:8, 9) Same argument: the fire is everlasting, not the torture.

Here, we are introduced to another term: Gehenna. If you know a little Hebrew or Greek the word may be familiar. But those Bible readers who don’t know either of those languages are at the mercy of biased translators. I looked at 46 different translations online. 7 of them wrote “Gehenna”. The rest all used “hell” or “hell-fire”.

Is “Gehenna” hell? Decidedly not. Here’s how we know: First, it's an illustration. Jesus is not telling anyone to literally cut off a foot or a hand. Second, he said your alternatives are to “enter into life” or to go to “Gehenna”. What's Gehenna? 

In Jesus’ day the garbage dump outside the wall of Jerusalem was the valley of Hinnom. In Hebrew, that’s ge hinnom and in Greek, Gehenna. Besides garbage, carcasses of dead animals and of executed criminals who didn't have family that would bury them were thrown there. Like the illustration above from Isaiah 66, worms and maggots ate up whatever organic matter was out of reach of the flames. Sulfur was occasionally thrown there to keep the fire burning when there wasn’t enough fuel.

On another occasion Jesus told his followers: “Do not become fearful of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, fear him (God, not Satan) who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.” (Matthew 10:28) God can not only end a person’s life, but he can end any chance of that person every being resurrected. Jesus promised at John 5:28, “All those in the tombs will hear his voice and come out.”

The Jews in his day put the bodies of those they believed would be remembered in the resurrection into whitewashed tombs they called “memorials”. The bodies of criminals and others they judged unworthy of resurrection got consigned to ge hinnom, the garbage dump. For example, according to the Mishnah, the rabbis taught that a man conversing with a woman, as Jesus did with the Samaritan woman at the well, “brings evil upon himself and neglects the study of the Law and at the last will inherit Gehenna.” (Aboth 1:5)

Jesus made clear what he thought of their thinking: “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you resemble whitewashed graves, which outwardly indeed appear beautiful but inside are full of dead men’s bones.” (Matthew 23:27)

Aside from the gospel writers the only other reference to Gehenna is an illustration made by Jesus’ half-brother James, in which he compared the destructiveness of a gossiping tongue to Gehenna. (James 3:6)

The book of Revelation doesn’t use the word. That may be surprising, until you remember that it was written more than a quarter century after the destruction of Jerusalem, including its garbage dump, ge hinnom.

Revelation does use a term that reminds us of Gehenna: the lake of fire. Is that a reference to Hell? No. If we just read what it says, we quickly see that the lake of fire is an illustration with the same properties as Gehenna; complete destruction, and no coming back.

“The wild beast was caught, and along with it the false prophet that performed in front of it the signs with which he misled those who received the mark of the wild beast and those who worship its image. While still alive, they both were hurled into the fiery lake that burns with sulfur.” (Revelation 19:20) 

The “wild beast” and the “false prophet” are not people. They are organizations opposed to God. Organizations don’t go to hell. Being thrown into this fiery lake makes clear that those organizations will be destroyed and will never return.

“The Devil who was misleading them was hurled into the lake of fire and sulfur, where both the wild beast and the false prophet already were.” (Revelation 20:10)

“Death and the Grave were hurled into the lake of fire.” (Revelation 20:14) 

Death: death as in, everybody dies because we all inherited sin from Adam… that death that we view as 'natural' will be destroyed. The Grave? Well, once everyone who is to be resurrected has been resurrected, there will no longer be memorial tombs, will there?

This verse also adds this detail, “This means the second death, the lake of fire.” Different from the death we all inherited from Adam and will be resurrected from. This second death has to be a death from which there is no resurrection, reinforcing our reasoning that the lake of fire is the same as Gehenna.

The next verse, finally, talks about wicked people in connection with this lake: “Whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire.” Hellfire? No. Complete destruction, with no coming back.

And the final reference that the hellfire people might lean on: “As for the cowards and those without faith and those who are disgusting in their filth and murderers and the sexually immoral and those practicing spiritism and idolaters and all the liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur. This means the second death.” (Revelation 21:8)

AHA! Hellfire for the wicked! No.

The verse immediately before this says: “To anyone thirsting I will give from the spring of the water of life free. Anyone conquering will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be my son.” (Revelation 21:6, 7)

God, the father of Adam, is by extension our father. He wants us to be in that family arrangement. He provided his son as a ransom to buy us back from Adam’s sin, and the resurrection to bring us back from Adamic death. He arranged for Jesus to become our “eternal father” (Isaiah 9:6,7) in place of Adam. So naturally, anyone who rejects God’s family and persists in the practices listed in verse 8 is thrown into the lake of fire. Not hellfire. Destruction, with no chance of coming back.


Please leave a comment or question. To read another column on this subject click here. 
 
Bill K. Underwood is a columnist and author of several books. You can help support this channel by clicking on this link to purchase one of his books at Amazon.com.

Thursday, August 28, 2025

Is Hell real?


Does the Bible really teach hellfire? No, it does not. Absolutely, positively, no.

Why do so many conservative Christians believe in Hell – not typically for themselves, mind you, but more especially for those who disagree with them?

  • You don’t believe the universe is only 6,000 years old? You’re going to Hell.
  • You don’t believe Jesus is God? You’re going to Hell.
  • You don’t believe that all good people go to heaven? You’re going to Hell.
  • You don’t observe the Sabbath? You’re going to Hell.
  • You don’t believe that being saved by God’s grace is the most vital teaching in the Bible? You’re going to Hell.

As I’ve said in several earlier columns: If ONE scripture, properly understood, contradicts your belief, it's time to abandon the belief.

So let’s start at the beginning:

Our English word “hell” derives from a German word, which is also the root of the English word “hole”. The German word was also closely connected with the Hebrew word “sheol”.

Why should we care about word origins? Well, the Hebrew word “sheol” occurs 65 times in the Old Testament. When the King James was translated in 1611, it rendered sheol as “hell” only 31 times, not the full 65.

Wait; what?

Exactly. If the Bible’s message was that bad people go to hell, shouldn’t all 65 times have been consistently translated as hell? Why did the KJV sometimes render sheol as something else? Because some of those other verses directly contradicted their beliefs about Hell.

For example: 

Ecclesiastes 9:10 says, “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.”

 Why did the translators render sheol as “grave” in that passage instead of “hell”?

Clearly, because it says we are all going to…whatever sheol is. It also makes it clear that we will all be asleep there – no work, no devising, no thinking, certainly no torture. If you believe Sheol is hellfire, then this verse contradicts your belief. So let’s not tell people this is one of the places that says “sheol” in Hebrew and should be rendered “hell” if we were honest. Let’s just change it to read ‘grave’. 

 Here's another one:

"O that thou wouldest hide me in the grave, that thou wouldest keep me secret, until thy wrath be past, that thou wouldest appoint me a set time, and remember me!" (Job 14:13)

The Hebrew says "sheol"; the KJV translators rendered it 'the grave'. Why? Well, why would Job pray to go to hell? He wouldn't. But Job understood not only that there was no torture after death, but also that God would remember him at some future time and bring him back to life. If his choices were heaven or hell instantly at death, as many Christians today believe, why would he pray to be remembered?

But what about all those places in the Bible that teach torment in “hellfire”? 

Well: First of all, name one. I’ll wait. The Bible does not include the word "hellfire" in any verse at all. While there are passages that seem to teach about a burning place where souls are tormented forever, they can't mean that; we've just proven that the Bible teaches that the dead are unconscious, awaiting a resurrection. How can you torment someone who is unconscious? Therefore, the verses that seem to be suggesting torment after death, have to mean something else.

We’ll deal with that false teaching in the next column.

 Please feel free to leave a comment. To read another of my columns on a similar subject click here.

 Bill K. Underwood is a columnist and author of several books. You can help support this channel by clicking on this link to purchase one of his books at Amazon.com.