Imagine you’ve been wrongly accused of sexual misconduct. A
13-year-old tells their parents about engaging in inappropriate sexual conduct
and they point the finger at you – unjustly. The parents go to the minister of
your congregation. You are called on the carpet. You, of course, vehemently deny
any such wrongdoing. The minister questions the child regarding the details. He
establishes a time and place of the supposed incident. You have no alibi for
that time.
What should happen next? You tell me. Pick the response
below that you feel is, not only proper, but scriptural. Remember that it is
YOU who has been unjustly accused:
- The minister tells you that, in the absence of any evidence, the accusation will be disregarded. Perhaps he further tells you to be especially careful to never be alone with a child so as to prevent any allegations in the future.
- The minister calls the police.
- The minister tells the parents to call the police.
- The minister tells the parents that they may call the police, but they need to be aware that the Bible warns against false accusations the same way that it warns against sexual misconduct.
- Should the minister now take disciplinary action against you because there are multiple accusations?
- Should the minister now call the police?
- Should the minister now urge the parents to call the police?
- Should the minister maintain that there is still no evidence and remind the parents about the gravity of making false accusations?
If you or someone you know is struggling to support a pioneer lifestyle, maybe this will help: "99 Ways to Fire Your Boss" is a huge collection of income ideas, plus powerful suggestions for living a simpler life! Look for it on Amazon.com
But if false accusations were unheard of, there wouldn't be guidelines about them in the Bible. You can see where this is going. “Innocent until
proven guilty” has long been a fundamental principle under the law, because most legal systems are based on Bible principles. When we are
unjustly accused we want that principle to be followed in our case.
Unfortunately, when we hear that someone else had an accusation made
against them but no disciplinary action was taken, we tend to believe the case
was mishandled. Especially if the accused turns out later to be guilty. Especially
if there were children involved.
It’s called “20-20 hindsight;” it’s called being a “Monday-morning-quarterback,”
named for water-cooler discussions on Monday about the previous day’s football
games.
In a case in California involving a former Jehovah’s Witness, a man is suing to obtain Jehovah’s
Witnesses confidential records – not just those pertaining to his case, but ALL
confidential records of ALL accusations.
If you think that’s a good idea, you need to re-read the
example at the top of this column. If you were falsely accused, and an elder in
a Jehovah’s Witness congregation heard the accusation, do you want your name and
that accusation to become public knowledge? If you are a Catholic and the false accusation was made to your priest, how would you feel about your priest being forced to tell the authorities about the accusation?
Please leave a polite comment. Comments are moderated, so
don’t waste your time typing something snarky. Follow me on Facebook.
This column does not use Google Adsense. If you feel like supporting this page, just buy one
of my books.
All of my novels are now available on Amazon. Click here to read a sample.